Bind PortfolioProperty management for multifamily operators and PHAs
A property management platform that runs the whole lifecycle and holds less of your residents' data.
Applications, screening, leasing, accounting, maintenance, the resident portal, and compliance reporting. One system of record, running on source-verified data, so the platform never sits on a decade of pay stubs, SSNs, bank exports, and nonpublic lease terms.
Portfolio
4 properties · 2,412 units · July 2026
| Property | Occ. | Collected | Delinq. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Larchmont Court | 96% | $482K | 1.2% |
| Oakline Flats | 93% | $361K | 3.4% |
| Cedar & 9th | 95% | $284K | 1.8% |
| Hillside 220 | 91% | $153K | 2.9% |
The whole lifecycle, in one platform
From application intake through renewal, on one system of record. Nothing on this page is a separate purchase or a bolt-on.
Applications & screening
Online applications, screened against your written criteria, verified at the source.
Leasing & e-sign
Generate, send, and countersign leases. Keep the terms, not a pile of PII.
Accounting & payments
Full GL, AP and AR, rent collection, and reconciliation in one ledger.
Maintenance & work orders
Requests with photos, vendor assignment, and status tracked to close.
Resident portal
Residents pay, request, and message in one place. One thread per unit.
Owner & compliance reporting
Owner statements, HUD eligibility records, and audit-ready reporting on demand.
Leasing
From application to signed lease, in one pipeline
See every applicant and where they are. Screening runs against your criteria and verifies income at the source, so an approval is a signed decision, not a folder of documents you now hold.
- ✓ Online applications routed to one inbox
- ✓ Source-verified income and identity
- ✓ Lease generation and e-sign
- ✓ A signed decision and audit record, not the file
Accounting
Accounting and owner reporting, built in
A full general ledger, not an export to a second system. Post charges, reconcile payments, and produce owner statements and HUD-ready reporting from the same records the rest of the platform runs on.
- ✓ General ledger, AP, and AR
- ✓ Automated owner statements
- ✓ HUD eligibility and subsidy records
- ✓ Real-time financials by property
Owner statement · Larchmont Court
July 2026| Rent income | $482,140 |
| Other income | $13,910 |
| Maintenance | -$61,320 |
| Management fee | -$34,600 |
| Utilities & other | -$53,180 |
| Distribution | $346,950 |
Maintenance
Work orders that close the loop
Residents submit requests with photos. You route to a vendor, track status, and keep the full history on the unit. Nothing lives in a text thread you have to search later.
- ✓ Resident-submitted requests with photos
- ✓ Vendor assignment and scheduling
- ✓ Status tracked from open to closed
- ✓ Full history retained on the unit
Resident portal
One place for residents to pay, request, and message
Residents pay rent, submit maintenance, sign documents, and message the office from one portal. Every action lands on the right unit in the platform, so the office is never reconstructing what happened.
- ✓ Online rent payment and autopay
- ✓ Maintenance requests with photos
- ✓ Lease documents and renewals
- ✓ Messaging tied to the unit
Public housing authorities
Built for Section 8, public housing, and HUD
Public agencies carry the same data-custody exposure as any operator, with FOIA requests and HUD audits on top. Bind Portfolio runs the Housing Choice Voucher and public housing lifecycle on income verified at the source, and returns a signed, audit-ready record for every determination instead of a warehouse of tenant financials.
- ✓ Eligibility and income certification, verified at the source
- ✓ TTP, tenant rent, and HAP calculated
- ✓ Annual and interim recertifications tracked
- ✓ HUD-50058 and SEMAP-ready reporting
- ✓ A signed audit record for every determination
Certification · HCV-4821
Housing Choice Voucher
The difference
The reason to switch is the data model
The risk you carry is not that a vendor gets breached. It is that data you handed a vendor comes back at you, through discovery, a regulator, or a plaintiff.
Your current stack accumulates the raw material of every application and lease. Pay stubs, bank exports, government IDs, SSNs, and nonpublic lease and pricing terms build up across years and modules. Each one is a record you retain, secure, and can be ordered to produce.
The category already has a paper trail. In October 2018 RealPage paid $3 million to the FTC over tenant screening reports, where loose identity matching attached other people's criminal records to applicants. In August 2024 the Department of Justice sued RealPage over algorithmic rent coordination, and a proposed consent judgment filed 24 November 2025 restricts how it can use nonpublic competitively sensitive data and puts it under a court-appointed monitor for three years. The operators who supplied the data settled separately: 26 landlords for a combined $141.8 million, with Greystar alone at $50 million. The data operators handed over became part of that record.
A clean SOC 2 report answers a different question. SOC 2 describes how a vendor guards data it holds. It does not ask whether that data should exist, who can subpoena it, or what happens to your nonpublic terms once they are pooled with everyone else's. The exposure is the accumulation, not the controls.
How the data model differs
Verify at the source
Income, identity, and eligibility get checked through a direct connection to the source. No pay stub or bank PDF gets uploaded and warehoused.
Keep the result, not the PII
Bind retains the signed decision, the criteria applied, and a tamper-evident audit record. Not a standing store of source documents to defend.
Your business data stays yours
Your nonpublic lease terms and pricing are not pooled into a shared model or sold back to the market as a product.
Leaving is clean
You export your records and the platform's copy is deleted. Your own data does not become the switching cost.
Incumbent PMS, and Bind Portfolio
Same lifecycle coverage. A different answer on what the platform keeps.
| Incumbent PMS | Bind Portfolio | |
|---|---|---|
| Applications and screening | Yes. | Yes, verified at the source. |
| Leasing, accounting, maintenance | Yes. | Yes, the full lifecycle. |
| Resident portal, owner and compliance reporting | Yes. | Yes, including HUD records. |
| What you store on residents | Pay stubs, bank data, IDs, SSNs, full files. | Signed decisions and audit records. No source documents. |
| What discovery or a subpoena reaches | The raw PII and every retained record. | Only the decision record. The source data was never yours. |
| What an adverse action dispute requires | Documents you did not create or fully control. | The criteria and the signed result behind it. |
| If a laptop walks out | Resident PII can leave with it. | No resident PII sits on it to take. |
| Does your lease and pricing data stay yours | Often pooled into shared models and market products. | Yes. It stays yours and is never pooled. |
| What happens to your data if you leave | It stays, and becomes your switching cost. | You export it. The platform's copy is deleted. |
Objections worth raising
We already have a PMS and migration is a nightmare.
Migration is the real switching cost, so Bind treats it as our job. We map your current data, stand up the lifecycle in parallel, and cut over when it is boring. The call starts with what a migration would actually touch.
Can you actually cover everything Yardi does?
The platform runs applications, screening, leasing, accounting, maintenance, the resident portal, and owner and compliance reporting. Name the specific workflow you depend on and we will show you where it lives. This is a platform, not a screening tool with ambitions.
Our current vendor is SOC 2 certified.
SOC 2 protects data a vendor holds. It does not address whether that data should sit there, who can subpoena it, or whether your nonpublic terms get pooled across customers. Bind changes what accumulates in the first place.
How do you verify income if you never hold the documents?
The applicant authorizes a direct connection to the source: payroll processor, bank, or issuing authority. Bind reads the verified values through that connection, checks them against your criteria, and signs the result. The proof is a signed attestation plus an audit record, not a PDF you store and hope is real.
Legal has not flagged this, so why now?
Most legal teams have not, because the exposure read as theoretical until operators began settling over data they supplied. The RealPage matter moved it out of theory. Map where resident data physically sits before a discovery request, rather than during one.
Who this is for
Bind fits operators who run the full lifecycle at volume. Multifamily operators in roughly the 500 to 5,000 unit range. Public housing authorities running eligibility, screening, and HUD reporting. Teams that already have a PMS and a written criteria set, and are tired of both.
If you manage a handful of units, or you are not ready to move your system of record, this is not for you yet. Bind replaces a platform. It does not sit beside one.
Twenty minutes on your stack
Walk us through your current platform and where your resident data physically sits, from application intake to the records you still hold on former residents. We will show you what the same lifecycle looks like without the pile. Not a demo. Not a trial.
We reply from a real person. No sequence, no auto-demo.